Sunday, 4 June 2017

Your grandfathers in the Eastern Nigerian Consultative Assembly mapped out Biafra boundaries and not IPOB. Educating the Henshaws and other poorly educated "South-Southerners"

Your grandfathers in the Eastern Nigerian Consultative Assembly  mapped out Biafra Boundaries and not IPOB. Educating the Henshaws and other half-baked educated "South-Southerners"
Perhaps Kate Henshaw who is recently troubled by the map of Biafra may not have heard of the Eastern Nigeria Consultative Assembly. This was the powerful Eastern Nigeria group alongside the  Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders mapped out Biafran territories and mandated General Odimegwu Ojukwu, the then military governor of Eastern Nigeria to declare the independence of the Republic of Biafra. 
“WE, THE CHIEFS, Elders and Representatives of Eastern Nigeria, gathered at this Joint Meeting of the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders and the Consultative Assembly do solemnly declare as follows:  a)MANDATE His Excellency  Lt.- Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, Military Governor of  Eastern Nigeria to declare at the earliest practicable date Eastern Nigeria a free, sovereign and independent state by the name and title of the REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA."



Many young Nigerians, such as ken/Kate Henshaw who never studied history in school or probably received half-baked education from Nigerian universities do not know that Biafra was not a unilateral decision by Ojukwu oor Igbo-speaking Biafrans. They have not also taken the pains to know the truth and rather chose to brandish poorly educated minds in public.

The only difference between the map of Biafra of 1967 and that of 2017 is the inclusion of communities in Delta , which was then in the Mid West region (note that many of Biafran soldiers including Achuzia, Nzeowgu were from this part), Igbanke in Edo State and those of Igala in Kogi, and Idoma in Benue States. However, these are ethnic Igbo groups wrongfully drafted into these states who have declared their intention to be reintegrated with their kins in Biafra.

I have started to celebrate Biafran month with tributes to three distinguished Biafra gentlemen - Asari Dokubo

I have started to celebrate Biafran month with tributes to three distinguished Biafra gentlemen - Asari Dokubo
The Biafran has taken the pains to educate the likes of Kate Henshaw and other shallow-minded "south-Southerners on these issues through this crash history  programme. 

It was widely reported last week that one Henshaw (Ken or Kate) had written the following:
“I think the current generation of ‘Biafrans’ are the most funny people I have ever seen.

How dare you sit in your home or offices and draw your Biafra map and include places like Rivers, Cross River, Akwa Ibom, etc as part of your empire? Did you consult them? Did you seek their opinions? 
You are forcing people to join a country whose commander in chief you have already anointed- Nnamdi Kanu; whose currency you have already decided- Biafra Pounds; whose official religion you have already adopted- Judaism; whose God you have already chosen- Chukwu Abiama? Do you not realize that you are doing to those people the same thing you accuse the British and Nigeria of doing to you? For carving my state into your ‘Biafra’ and renaming it without my permission and consultation, I have a moral duty to stand against you with everything I have.
''I am not standing against you because I do not want your freedom; I stand against you because I love mine too. I don’t stand against you because you don’t have a right to your country; I stand against you because I have the same right. I stand against you because your map is an insult to me and my freedom to choose where I belong. Be warned!”
However, his contentious map was delineated a long time ago by their forefathers in the Eastern Nigeria Consultative Assembly.

Below is a blow by blow account of the issues that led to the declaration of Biafra, and the roles played by representatives of various communities in the then Eastern Nigeria in the declaration of Biafra.

PROCLAMATION
OF THE
REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA
1967   
PRINTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PRINTER . ENUGU


PROCLAMATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA

IT IS RIGHT and just that we of this generation of Eastern Nigerians, should record for the benefit of posterity, some of the reasons for the momentous decision we have taken at this crucial time in the history of our people.    
The Military Government of Eastern Nigeria has, in a series of publications, traced the evils and injustices of the Nigerian political association through the decades, stating also the case and standpoint of Eastern Nigeria in the recent crisis. 
Throughout the period of Nigeria’s precarious, existence as a single political entity Eastern Nigerians have always believed in funda­mental human rights and principles as they are accepted and enjoyed in civilized communities. Impelled by their belief in these rights arid principles and in their common citizenship with other Nigerians after Amalgamation, Eastern Nigerians employed their ideas and skills, their resourcefulness and dynamism in the development of areas of Nigeria outside the East. Eastern Nigerians opened up avenues of trade and industry throughout the country; overlooked the neglect of their homeland in the disposition of national institutions, projects and utilities; made available their own natural resources to the rest of the country; and confidently invested in the general economic and social development of Nigeria. Politically Eastern Nigerians advocated a strong, united Nigeria; for ONE COUNTRY, ONE CONSTITUTION, ONE DESTINY. Eastern Nigerians were in the vanguard of the struggle for national independence and made sacrifices and concessions for the cause of national unity. . They conceded the inauguration of a Federal instead of a Unitary system of Government in Nigeria. 
Leaders of Northern Nigeria have told us several times that what our former colonial masters made into “NIGERIA" consisted of an agglomeration of peoples, distinct in ‘every way except in the colour of their skins, and organized as a unit for their own commercial interests” and administrative convenience.. The name “Nigeria”. was regarded by many as a mere “geographical expression”. 

Your grandfathers in the Eastern Nigerian Consultative Assembly  mapped out Biafra Boundaries and not IPOB. Educating the Henshaws and other poorlyeducated "South-Southerners"

In course of time, the peoples of the other parts of Southern Nigeria found that they possessed many things in common with those of Eastern Nigeria, and while the colonial master made adjustments to accommodate these common ties between the Southern inhabitants, the peoples of the North insisted on maintaining their separateness.
       On October 1, 1960, independence was granted to the peoples of Nigeria in a form of “federation”, based on artificially made units. The Nigerian Constitution installed the North in, perpetual dominance over Nigeria The Federation was predicated on the perpetual rule by One unit over the others. The Constitution itself contained provisions which negatived the fundamental human freedoms which it purported to guarantee for the citizens. Thus were sown, by design or by default, the seeds of factionalism and hate, of struggle for power at the Centre, and of the worst types of political chicanery and abuse of power. .One of two situations was bound to result from that arrangement either perpetual domination of the rest of the country by the North, not by consent, but by force and fraud, or a dissolution of the federating bond. National independence was followed by successive crises each  leading to near disintegration of the country.  Some of the major events which are directly attributable to the defective and inadequate Constitution may here be mentioned.
        In 1962, an emergency was imposed on Western Nigeria Jurists agree that the imposition was unconstitutional; it was a ruse to remove certain elements in Western Nigeria known to have taken a firm stand against the misuse of political, power. A puppet of the North was manoeuvred into power in Western Nigeria.  
        Also in 1962, and again in 1963, Nigerians tried for the first time to count themselves. What should ordinarily be a statistical and dull exercise was, because of the nature of the Constitution, turned into a fierce political struggle. The official figures established by these censuses have been discredited.Federal elections followed in December, 1964—elections which have been described as the most farcical in our history. Candidates were either kidnapped, killed or forced to withdraw from the elections. Results announced were in direct opposition to the actual facts. The Southern parties had boycotted the election, and the deadlock which followed brought the country near to dissolution. The situation was patched up; the conflagration was brought under control, but its  embers lay smouldering.   
          ON October 11, 1965,  elections were held to the Western House of Assembly. The puppet Government of that Region existed, not by the will of the people of Western Nigeria, but because of the combined power of the Federal Government and the Northern Nigeria Govern­ment which installed it. The electorate of Western Nigeria was not permitted to declare its will in the elections. Fraud, foul play and murder were committed with impunity. The smouldering embers of the recent past erupted with unquenchable virulence. The irate electorate showed its resentment in its own way. Complete disorder followed. Yet, the Federal Government dominated by the North fiddled with the issue and even refused to recognize what the whole world had known, namely, that Nigeria was on the brink of disaster.


BIAFRA IS NOT A DREAM!!! Asari Dokubo adds another etymological direction to Biafra - "It is a Kalabari word"

        Only the Armed Forces remained politically uncommitted and non-partisan. Some of their officers and men revolted against the injustices which were perpetrated before their very eyes and attempted to overthrow .The. Federal Government and Regional Governments. In desperation; the Ministers of the Federal Government handed over power to the Armed Forces under the Supreme command of Major-General J. T. U. Aguiyi-Ironsi. 
        The Military administration under Major-General Aguiyi-Ironsi made the first real attempt to unite the country and its peoples. The Northerners saw in his efforts the possibility of losing their control of the affairs of the country. So while its leaders paid lip service to unity, they laid plans for making sure that it could never be achieved. Major-General Aguiyi-Ironsi was, of course, an Easterner, but the majority of the individuals at the head of affairs were not. At no time under the civilian rule did Eastern Nigerians hold a dominating position in the government of the Federation.
         On May 24, 1966, the Military Government issued a. decree designed to provide a more unified administration in keeping with the military command. The people of Northern Nigeria protested against the decree  and on May 29,1966, thousands of Easterners residing in the North, were massacred by Northern civilians They looted their property The Supreme Military Council set up a tribunal to look into the causes of these unprovoked acts at murder and pillage and determine what compensations might be paid to the victims.  The Northern Emirs declared their intention to pull Northern Nigeria out of the Federation rather than face  the tribunal .  But the Supreme Military Council justly decided that the tribunal  must do its duty.
        Then on July 29, 1966, two months after the May murders and despoliation, and four days before the tribunal was due to commence its sitting, the real pogrom  against Eastern Nigerians  residing in the Federation began. Major-General Aguiyi-Ironsi and his host, Lt-Col. Francis Fajuyi,, were kidnapped at Ibadan and murdered.This time Northern soldiers acted in concert with Northern civilians. Defenceless men, women, and children were shot down or hacked to death; some were burnt, and some buried alive. Women and young girls were ravished with unprecedented bestiality; unborn children were torn out of the womb of their mothers.  
        Again on September 29, 1966, the pogrom was resumed Thirty thousand Eastern Nigerians are known to have been killed by North­erners. They were killed in  the North, in Western Nigeria, in Lagos; some Eastern soldiers  detention at Benin were forcibly removed from prison by Northern soldiers and murdered.
        At the time of the incident, millions of Eastern Nigerians resided outside the East and persons from other parts of the country lived in this Region . While Eastern Nigerians who assembled at Northern airports, railway stations and motor parks, were set upon by Northern soldiers and civilians armed with machine guns, rifles, daggers and poisoned arrows, the Army and Police in the East were specifically instructed to shoot at sight any Eastern Nigerian found molesting non-Easterners living in the Region.  By early October, the sight of mutilated refugees, orphaned children, widowed mothers and decapitated corpses of Eastern Nigerians arriving at our airports and railway stations inflamed passions to such an extent that it was found necessary to ask all non-Easterners to leave the region in their own interest. Since the events of July, 1966, there has been a mass movement of population in this country. Nigerian society has undergone a funda­mental change; it is no longer possible for Eastern Nigerians to live outside the Region without fear of loss of life or of property.  
        Two facts emerge from the events described above. The wide­spread nature of the massacre and its periodicity—29th May, 29th July, and 29th September—show firstly, that they were premeditated and planned, and secondly, that Eastern Nigerians are no longer wanted as equal partners in the Federation of Nigeria. It must be recalled that this was the fourth in a series of massacres of Eastern Nigerians in the last two decades.  
        At the early stages of the crisis, the world was told that it was a conflict between the North and the East. That pretence collapsed when it became clear that Northern soldiers moved into Western Nigeria and Lagos as another step in Northern Nigeria’s bid to continue her so-called conquest to the sea. Belatedly, it was generally accepted that the fundamental issue was not a struggle between the East and the North, but one involving the very existence of Nigeria as one political entity. Throughout the Nigerian crises, some of the indegenious judges have been found quite unequal to their calling by reason of their involvement in partisan politics.  People soon lost faith in them, and would not go to their courts for redress. In some measure, they were res­ponsible for the collapse of the  rule of law in certain parts of Nigeria. Providence has spared us in the East from this terrible calamity.
        It is now, necessary to summarise the attempts of the Government and people of Eastern Nigeria to solve the crisis, and of the bad faith with which these attempts have been received. 
        On August 9, 1966, representatives of the Military Governors meeting in Lagos made decisions for restoring peace and for clearing the way for constitutional talks notably the decision that troops be all repatriated to their region of origin. These decisions were not fully implemented.        
        On September 12, the Ad Hoc Constitutional Conference consisting of delegates representing all the Governments of the Federation met in Lagos, and for three weeks sought to discover a form of association best suited to Nigeria having regard to the prevailing circumstances and their causes, and future possibilities. This Conference was unilaterally dismissed by Lt.-Col. Gowon, the Head of the Lagos Government.  
        It had become then impossible for the Supreme Military Council, the highest governing body in the Federation, to meet on Nigerian soil. As long as Northern troops were in Lagos and the West, no  venue could be found acceptable to all the Military Governors for a meeting of the Supreme Military Council in Nigeria.  It met at Aburi in Ghana on 4th and 5th January, 1967, on the basis of an agenda previously deter­mined by the official of the Governments of the country and adopted by the Supreme Military Council. Decisions reached at the meeting were ignored by .Lt.-Col.. Gowon ,and .the North.  In the interest of this Region and of the whole Country the  East stood firmly by those decisions, and, warned that they would be applied to Eastern Nigeria if steps were not taken by the Lagos Government to apply them generally. The East rejected all measures which did not reflect the decisions at  Aburi.  
        The Aburi accord was not implemented by the Lagos Government.  All the meetings of Military Leaders held since Aburi were held without the East. All the decisions taken by Lagos were taken without comment  and concurrence from the East.
        It became evident that each time Nigerians came close to a realistic solution to the current crisis by moving towards a loose form of associa­tion or confederation, Lt-Col. Gowon unilaterally  frustrated their efforts . When the representatives of the Military Governors decided on August 9 that troops be repatriated to their Regions of origin, and it  appeared to him that this would, lead to confederation, he unilaterally refused to fully implement  that decisjon.  When jn  September the Ad HOC Constitutional Conferençe appeared near agreement an a loose Federation, he unilaterally  dismissed them  indefinitely. When in January 1967, the Military Leaders agreed at  Aburi on what  the Federal Permanent Secretaries correctly interpreted as confederation he unilaterally rejected the Agreement to Which he had, voluntarily subscribed.  When in May, 1967, all the Southern Military Governors and the Leaders of Thought of their Regions  spoke out in favour of Confederation,  he  dismissed the Supreme Military Council and pro­claimed himself the dictator of Nigeria—an act which, to say the least, is treasonable.  
        Following the pogrom of 1966, some two million Eastern Nigerians have returned from other Regions, refugees in their own Country. Money was needed to care for them—not to give them mere relief but to rehabilitate them and, in time, restore their outraged feelings. The Lagos Government was urged to give the Eastern Nigeria Government its share of the statutory revenues.  Lt.-Col. Gowon refused to do so in the hope that the weight of the burden would lead to the economic collapse of Eastern Nigeria.  
        Ultimately, and beginning from April 1, 1967, steps were taken to recover what was due to Eastern Nigeria and to enable this Region and her people to survive. These are the “Survival Edicts”: The Revenue Collection Edict, the Legal Education (Eastern Nigeria) Edict, the Statutory Bodies Edict and the Court of Appeal Edict.  
        At each stage during the crisis, in accordance with the democratic and republican spirit of Eastern Nigerians, the people were fully consulted for their advice and guidance.  
        On August 31, 1966, the First Consultative Assembly and the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders consisting of four representa­tives from each administrative division and other interests were sum­moned and the facts relating to the crisis put before them. Their advice was as follows: 
“Be it resolved as follows:— 
      1.     We, the representatives of the various communities in Eastern Nigeria gathered in this Consultative Assembly, hereby declare our implicit confidence in the MIilitary Governor for Eastern Nigeria, Lt.-Col. Odumegwu Ojukwu, in all the actions he has so far taken to deal with the situation which has arisen in Nigeria since May 29, 1966.
       2.    In view of the grave threat to our survival as ‘a unit in the Republic of Nigeria, we. hereby urge and empower/advise him to take all such actions that might be necessary to protect the integrity of Eastern Nigeria and the lives and property of its inhabitants. 
       3.      We advise constant consultation by His Excellency with the Consultative Assembly. 
      4.      In view of the gravity of the present situation we affirm com­plete faith in and urge the need for solidarity of Eastern Nigeria as a unit. 
     5.      In view of the present situation of things no delegates be sent to Lagos for any constitutional talks unless the safety of the delegates is guaranteed.”  
        After the adjournment of the Ad Hoc Constitutional Conference, these bodies, now enlarged to consist of ten representatives from each administrative division in Eastern Nigeria and other sectors of the community were summoned. The delegates to the Ad Hoc Constitu­tional Conference placed a full report before them, and by a resolution dated October 7, 1966, the Consultative, Assembly and the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders advised as follows:  
1.    PLACES on - record its. deep gratitude to, the Eastern Nigeria Delegation to the Constitutional Conference in Lagos for the diligent and faithful way in which, under conditions of severe strain, tension and fear, they carried out the mandate given to them by the Consul­tative Assembly and the, Chiefs and Elders of Eastern Nigeria.  
2.    ENDORSES the stand of the Eastern Delegation it the Lagos Constitutional Conference.
3      URGES that as an interim measure,  a beginning  be made to implement those aspects  of the recommendations as relate to the Armed Forces at least to the extent of returning to their Regions of origin and vesting the operational control of the regional contingents in the respective Military Governors.
4       RE-AFFIRMS  its acceptance of the  Report of the Committee on the Pattern of Constitution for Eastern Nigeria within the Federation of Nigeria and the additional suggestions proposed by the Graham -­Douglas Constitutional  Committee regarding the  legislative and executive functions to be devolved upon the Provincial  Units and urges that the Constitutional Committee should  forthwith study the details of the scheme with particular reference to the number and size of provinces, the distribution of functions between the Provinces and the Regional Government financial arrangements and the method and tuning of implementation.  
5       ENDORSES both the principle of the creation of more states in Nigeria and the statement of the Eastern Delegation to the Lagos Constitutional Conference to the effect that the splitting up of the country at this stage is not what is needed to normalize the conditions of life in the country and provide a sense of security for its inhabitants, that immediate constitutional arrangements for the country as a whole should be made on the basis of the existing Regions in order to save the country from impending disintegration
6       SINCE the issue of the creation of  more states is a  vital and inevitable item on the Agenda of the Lagos  Constitutional Con­ference, RECCOMENDS  the following as the conditions upon which , the creation of states should proceed:-
(a)  The basis for the creation of states must be mutually agreed upon beforehand and must be uniformly and consistently applied throughout the country. 
(b)  The creation of states must take place simultaneously throughout the country. 
(c) The creation of any new state must be based upon the consent of the people of the area which is to be included in the proposed state and where two or more distinct tribal  groupings are comprised within such area the wishes of each such grouping must be separately ascertained and respected. 
(d)  The population, area and economic resources of any new state which it is proposed to create must be reasonably commensurate to the enormous functions which the states will be expected to perform under the new constitutional arrangements envisaged for Nigeria.  
7. IN VIEW of the fact that the desire on the part of the minority groups for self-determination is the active force behind the demand for the creation of  more states  and since in the context of present-day Nigeria minorities are defined by reference to tribe, AFFIRMS its belief that the best hope for a satisfactory solution to the problems of Nigeria lies in the recognition and preservation of the separate identity of the various tribal or linguistic groupings and their right to develop each along its own line and at its own pace accordingly
RECOMMENDS that the creation of states throughout Nigeria should be on the basis of tribal or linguistic groupings or mutual consent between the linguistic groupings. 
8.  ADVISES that, until the agreements, reached by the personal representatives of the Military Governors on August 8 and 9 are fully implemented, and until immediate compensation is paid by the Federal Military Government for the lives and property of Easterners lost in the disturbed areas of Nigeria, the Eastern Nigeria Delegation should no longer participate in future Constitutional Conference. 
9.      SATISFIED that the interim report of the Constitutional Con­ference has been completely overtaken by the most recent events in the country, ADVISES that the only possible and logical solution to the problem of political association for Nigeria lies in the organization and running of common services.


A.  IK0KUChairman

DATED 7th October, 1966.

 On November 23, 1966, they met again to consider the progress of the crisis. They resolved as follows:—


 RECALLING the atrocious murders of persons of Eastern Nigeria origin and other acts of barbarism and inhumanity committed ‘against us in other parts of Nigeria by fellow countrymen among whom they lawfully resided;  

AWARE of the planned and determined effort to exclude Eastern Nigeria and her people from the public affairs and public offices of the Federal Republic of Nigeria;  
CONSCIOUS of the attempt made and being made, by the Government and people of Eastern Nigeria, in spite of the wrongs done to Eastern Nigeria to promote peace and salvage what is left of Nigeria and her honour;  
DETERMINED to protect and defend the integrity of Eastern Nigeria and the dignity of her people;  
CONFIRMING the mandate given by us to our Delegates to the Ad hoc Constitutional Conference, and our confidence in them,  and having noted with regret the indefinite adjournment of the meeting of the Ad Hoc Constitutional Conference by Lt -Col Yakubu Gowon  for alleged inability to agree upon the venue of the meeting as well as according to him, because of other difficulties  which he has not named;  
OBSERVING that,  even though the decision  to appoint the Ad Hoc Constitutional Conference was a unanimous agreement of the Governments of the Federation, yet the adjournment was made without consultation with or consent by the Eastern Nigeria Government; 
HAVING also noted the many acts of bad faith on the part of the Gowon Government and its inability to fulfil promises or implement agreements unanimously reached,  
FINDING now that there is a plot hatched up by certain civil servants and other officials with the active involvement of Lt.-Col. Yakubu Gowon to impose a constitution and certain other measures on Nigeria;  
RE-AFFIRMING the implicit ‘confidence of the people of Eastern Nigeria in His Excellency, Lt.-Col. Odumegwu Ojukwu and assuring him of the solidarity of Eastern Nigeria and their support and admira­tion for the way he has handled the present crisis facing Nigeria;
ALSO ASSURING His Excellency of the admiration of the people of Eastern Nigeria in the Military Government of Eastern Nigeria and their desire for its continued administration until it has achieved its objective of creating a new society in Eastern Nigeria;  
WE DO HEREBY RESOLVE that our Military Governor be advised as follows:—
    (1)    To take any measures he considers appropriate for the defence   and protection of the integrity of Eastern Nigeria, the lives and property of its inhabitants. 
    (2)    To maintain utmost vigilance against subversion of the Government of Eastern Nigeria not only from outside the Region, but also from within and to deal ruthlessly with anybody, high or low, engaged in subversion. 
    (3)    To resist the imposition on the people of Eastern Nigeria of any constitutional, administrative or legislative measures taken without prior consultation and agreement.
    (4)     To reject any solution which will undermine the economic and industrial progress and prosperity of Eastern Nigeria or which will tend to sow the seeds of future friction among the Regions of this Country.
    (5)     To continue with the good progress made so far in the rehabilitation of refugees. 
    (6)     To speed up the implementation of Provincial Administration with legislative and executive powers, and the re-establish­ment of Customary Courts. 
     (7)     To spare no efforts at the right time to purge former holders of public offices of corrupt practices so as to set a shining example for the youths of this Region, and inculcate into the people the spirit of honesty,. integrity, fair-play, mutual trust and a feeling of oneness which will provide the basis for our future progress.
     (8)     To continue Your Excellency’s efforts to bring about a meeting of Military Leaders and the reconvening of the Ad Hoc Constitutional Conference under conditions of adequate security satisfactory to Your Excellency. 
     (9)      To ensure that only men and women of integrity and merit are appointed to public offices, in the Region and that a code of conduct for public officers be drawn up  for Eastern Nigeria. 
LASTLY,  we assure Your Excellency that no Eastern Nigerian, whether living inside or outside this Region, has the mandate or support of the people of this Region to speak for or represent them UNLESS appointed with the recommendation and approval of Your Excellency acting on behalf of Eastern Nigeria.

                        Dated 23rd November, 1966                                      
A. IKOKU
Chairman
Eastern Nigeria Consultative Assembly Meeting

Since that date matters had become worse; sanctions had been imposed on Eastern Nigeria, warlike  preparations made against her; her isolation was complete.  Men  and women in the Region, jncensed by the treatment meted out to them by an unrepentant Lagos and the North, called for the, declaration of Eastern Nigeria as a sovereign  independent state.
In these circumstances the joint  meeting of  the Consultative Assembly and the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders was reconvened for a clear statement on the future course of action. After an appraisal of the development in the Nigerian crises past and  present had been presented to the joint session, a telegram just received  from the Lagos, Government was read.  The full text is as follows:-
“FURTHER  MY TELEX  OF.TWENTIETH MAY X I HAVE JUST RECEIVED YOUR LETTER PG/0897/11  OF MAY 16, 1967 X AS YOU ARE AWARE ECONOMIC . MEASURES COMPLAINED OF WERE LIFTED  IN RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF NATIONAL CONCILIATION COMMITTEE WITH EFFECT FROM MAY 23 X THEREFORE  DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED THAT YOU  HAVE NOT RESPONDED POSITIVELY X IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO COMMENCE MEASURES TO RESOLVE CRISIS WITHOUT BLOODSHED AND KEEP THE COUNTRY TOGETHER X .
  IT IS DESIRABLE YOU DECLARE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMME RECENTLY PROCLAIMED BY THE SUPREME MILITARY COUNCIL X THIS YOU WILL RECALL REQUIRES THE URGENT CREATION OF STATES SIMULTANEOUSLY ALL OVER THE COUNTRY TO REMOVE THREAT OF DOMINATION, PREPARATION OF NEW CONSTITUTION ON THEIR BAS1S X NEW CONSTITUTION CAN PROVIDE ALL SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERED NECESSARY FOR STATES GOVERNMENTS ALSO PROGRAMME ENVISAGES IMMEDIATE APPOINTMENT OF A REVENUE ALLOCATION COMMISSION TO FIND NEW FORMULA ON BASIS OF PRINCIPLE OF DERIVATION AND NEED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FUNDS FOR ESSENTIAL CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS PROGRAMME’ WILL ENSURE FAIR PLAY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY X
THEREFORE I EARNESTLY APPEAL TO YOU TO COOPERATE TO ARREST FURTHER DRIFT INTO DISINTEGRATION ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING REPRESENTATIVES OF ALL GOVERNMENTS CAN MEET WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY TO PLAN FOR SMOOTH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMME ADOPTED BY ALL YOUR COLLEAGUES OF THE SUPREME MILITARY COUNCIL MOST IMMEDIATE” 
On the evening of Saturday, May 27th, 1967 the joint session of the enlarged Consultative Assembly and the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders, after full deliberation, passed a resolution the text of which is as follows: 
“WE, THE CHIEFS, Elders and Representatives of Eastern Nigeria, gathered at this Joint Meeting of the Advisory Committee of Chiefs and Elders and the Consultative Assembly do solemnly declare as follows: 
“WHEREAS we have been in the vanguard of the national move­ment for the building of a strong, united and prosperous Nigeria where no man will be oppressed and have devoted our efforts, talents and resources to this end; 
“WHEREAS we cherish certain inalienable human rights and state obligations such as the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness; the right to acquire, possess and defend property; the provision of security; and the establishment of good and just government based on the consent of the governed;
“WHEREAS in practical demonstration of these beliefs, our people settled in other parts of Nigeria, served their country in many capacities, and contributed immensely to the growth and develop­ment of Nigeria;
“WHEREAS  we are living witnesses of injustices and atrocities committed against Eastern Nigeria, among which  are the pre­meditated murder of over 30,000 of our innocent men, women and children by Northern Nigerians, the calculated destruction of the property of our sons and daughters, the shameless Conversion of two million Eastern Nigerians into refugees in their own country, all this without remorse;
“WHEREAS in consequence of these and other acts of discrimina­tion and injustice, we have painfully realized that the Federation of Nigeria has ‘failed, and has given us no protection;
“WHEREAS in spite of these fads, the Government and people of Eastern Nigeria have persisted in’ their efforts to find a practical and just solution that would preserve the continued existence of Nigeria as one corporate unit and restore peace and confidence as demonstrated by the initiative of our Military Governor in getting all the military leaders together at Aburi, Ghana;
“WHEREAS  the hopes which the Abüri  Agreement  engendered have proved to be misplaced and have been destroyed by a series of acts of bad faith and distortions and finally by a refusal on the part of the “Lagos Government” to implement these and other Agreements notwithstanding the fact that they were freely and voluntarily entered into;
 WHEREAS the Federation of Nigeria has forfeited any  ‘claim to our allegiance by these acts and by the economic, political,  and diplomatic sanctions  imposed against us by the  Federal Government.
 “AND WHEREAS the object of government is the good of governed and the will of the people its ultimate sanction;
Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of these arid other facts and injustices, we, the Chiefs, Elders and Representatives of all  the Twenty Provinces of Eastern Nigeria, assembled in this JointMeeting of the Advisory Committee of Chiefs ‘and Elders and the Consultative Assembly, at Enugu this 27th day of May, 1967, we: hereby solemnly:
(a)MANDATE His Excellency  Lt.- Col. Chukwuemeka OdumegwuOjukwu, Military Governor of  Eastern Nigeria to declare at the earliest practicable date Eastern Nigeria a free, sovereign and independent state by the name and title of the REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA.
(b) RESOLVE that the new REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA shall have the full and absolute powers of a sovereign state, and shall establish, commerce, levy war, conclude peace, enter into diplomatic relations, and carry out, as of right, other sovereign respon­sibilities.
(c)DIRECT that the REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA may enter into arrange­ment with any sovereign unit or units in what remains of Nigeria or in any part of Africa desirous of association with us for the purpose of running a common services organization and for the establishment of economic ties.
(d) RECOMMEND that the REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA should become a member of the Commonwealth of Nations, the Organization   of African Unity and the United Nations Organization
(e) RECOMMEND the adoption of a Federal Constitution based on the new provincial units
(f) RE-AFFIRM HIS Excellency’s assurance of protection for the persons, properties and businesses of foreign nationals in our territory.
(g) DECLARE our unqualified confidence in the Military Governor of Eastern Nigeria, Lt.-Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, and assure him of our unreserved support for the way and manner he had handled the crisis in the country.
So help us God.”
                                               

THE DECLARATION

Fellow countrymen and women, YOU, the people of Eastern Nigeria: CONSCIOUS of the supreme authority of Almighty God over all mankind, of your duty to yourselves and posterity;
AWARE that you can no longer be protected in your lives and in your property by any Government based outside Eastern Nigeria;
BELIEVING that you are born free and have certain inalienable rights which can best be preserved by yourselves;
UNWILLING to be unfree partners in any association of a political or economic nature;
REJECTING the authority of any person or persons other than the Military Government of Eastern Nigeria to make any imposition of whatever kind or nature upon you;
DETERMINED to dissolve all political and other ties between you and the former Federal Republic of Nigeria;
PREPARED to enter into such association, treaty or alliance with any sovereign state within the former Federal Republic of Nigeria and elsewhere on such terms and conditions as best to subserve your common good;
AFFIRMING your trust and confidence in ME;
HAVING mandated ME to proclaim on your behalf, and in your name, that Eastern Nigeria be a, sovereign independent Republic,
NOW THEREFORE I, LIEUTENANT-COLONEL CHUKWUEMEKA ODUMEGWU OJUKWU, MILITARY GOVERNOR OF EASTERN NIGERIA, 
BY VIRTUE OF THE AUTHORITY, AND PURSUANT TO THE - PRINCIPLES, RECITED ABOVE, 
DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY PROCLAIM THAT THE TERRITORY AND REGION KNOWN AS AND CALLED EASTERN NIGERIA TOGETHER WITH HER CONTINENTAL  SHELF AND TERRITORIAL WATERS SHALL HENCEFORTH BE AN INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN STATE OF THE NAME AND TITLE OF,
“THE REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA”.
AND I DO DECLARE THAT—

(1)  all political ties between us and the Federal Republic of Nigeria are hereby totally dissolved;


(ii) all subsisting contractual  obligations entered into by the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or by any person, authority, organization or government acting on its behalf, with any person, authority or organization operating or relating to ant matter or thing, within the Republic of Biafra, shall henceforth  be deemed to be entered into  with the  Military Governor of the Republic of  Biafra for and on behalf of the Government and. people of the Republic of Biafra, and the convenants thereof shall, subject to this Declaration be performed by the parties according to their tenor;



(iii) all subsisting international treaties and obligations made on behalf of Eastern Nigeria by the Government of the Federal  Republic  of Nigeria, shall be honoured and respected;



(iv) Eastern Nigeria’s due share of all subsisting international debts and obligations entered into by the Government of the Republic of Nigeria on behalf of the Federation of Nigeria shall be honored and respected;



(v) steps will be taken to open discussions on the question of Eastern Nigeria’s due share of the assets of the Federation of Nigeria and personal, properties of the citizens of Biafra throughout the Federation of Nigeria;



(vi) the rights, privileges, pensions, etc., of all personnel of the Public Services, the Armed Forces and the Police now serving in any capacity within the Republic of Biafra, are hereby guaranteed;



(vii) we shall keep the door open for association with, and would welcome, any sovereign unit or units in the former Federa­tion of Nigeria Or in any other ‘parts of Africa desirous of association with us for the purposes of running a common services organization and for the establishment of economic ties;



(viii) we shall protect the lives and property of all’ foreigners residing in Biafra; we shall extend the hand of friendship to those nations who respect our sovereignty, and shall repel any interference in our internal affairs;

(ix)  we shall faithfully adhere to the charter of the Organization of African Unity and of the United Nations Organization;


(x)     it is our intention to remain a member of, the British Commonwealth of Nations in our right as a sovereign, independent nation.

 LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA!
 AND MAY GOD PROTECT ALL WHO LIVE IN HER!!

No comments:

Post a Comment