Islamization of Nigeria, to be or not to be?

Islamization of Nigeria , to be or not to be?

Most Christian commentators on the total islamization of Nigeria have always been on the same boat in the islamization predictions which from pastors to writers and visionary leaders like Odumegwu Ojukwu, have been repeatedly sounded for the past years but those house slaves who think that they are made called us miscreants fomenting trouble.

Today David Mark is crying genocide while Muammar Gaddafi advocated that Nigeria needs to be divided into 4 countries along ethnic and religious lines, he as the senate president then or majority leader called him a mad dog.





At Agatu, over 500 of his kits and kin were not only massacred, but the remnants were chased out of town by the annihilator. I posted these warnings from Nigerians in the Diaspora, in an international online writer's forum I belong, I picked only 3 out of about 2 warnings from different ethnic groups including Southern Zaria in Kaduna State.

There is an emergency meeting of Nigerian Christians in Europe and America this Easter weekend following the religious situation in Nigeria and consequent upon the Belgium bombing and the ISIS threat to Nigeria for joining the Islamic forces founded by Saudi Arabia recently.

In all, Christian leaders and the house slave Christian politicians will be asleep when the annihilator takes over Nigeria completely the way Arab/Moslem expansionism took over Turkey.

Christianity has a long history in Anatolia (Asia Minor) and Armenian Highland (now part of Turkey), which is the birthplace of numerous Christian Apostles and Saints, such as Paul of Tarsus, Timothy, Nicholas of Myra, Polycarp of Smyrna and many others.

The percentage of Christians in Turkey fell from 45 percent in 1914 to 2.5 percent in 1927, due to events which had a significant impact on the country's demographic structure, such as the Armenian Genocide and various Islamic intimidations. Today for same reason, Turkey is 99% Islam, the remnant of Christian community in Turkey is in ‘hide and seek’ religion.

The Muslim expansion into Europe came as a surprise when the continent was beginning to shed its image and get out of the shadow of the once great Roman Empire. But this meant that the once great unified territory had been split into multiple principalities and provinces fighting for control over small regions of territory. In other words the European continent was ripe for conquest and expansion. The first inhabitants in Europe to experience the power of the Islam East was the Iberian Peninsula.

After the fall of the Roman Empire the Iberian Peninsula became populated by a Germanic tribe called the Visigoths but these invaders were soon met by another invasion from the East. In 711, the Umayyad Empire invaded the peninsula and quickly conquered the lands of spain and began to move into France until they were stopped at Poiters in 732. The invading army were known as the Moors. The Muslim Moorish invaders were a force led by Arab muslims and other peoples from the recently conquered lands of the Umayyad Empire including berbers other North African peoples.

The Genetic Evidence

Recent mitochondrial DNA analysis performed on groups living in southern Spain and in North Africa around the Strait of Gibraltar show that both groups share the same haplogroups found in the Middle East but also the groups in Spain still show a large number of haplogroups from Europe as well. The Y chromosome data in these regions show an even lesser effect on populations. Around 10% of the population show decent from groups living in NW Africa. This evidence may show that even though the region was inhabited by invaders from the south there was little gene flow actually happening between the Christian inhabitants and their Muslim invaders. However further evidence reveals that out of the people with these haplogroups it has been found that the largest percentage of them have ancestry from Berbers rather than Arabs.

In a book published by Philip Jenkins ''The Disappearance of Christianity in Its Homeland'',

he narrates thus: In the summer of 2002, I traveled in southeastern Turkey to meet with members of the two-millennia-old Syriac church, of whom only a few thousand are left in their homelands. Their language, Syriac-Aramaic, is as close as any living language to the one that Jesus spoke, yet they are forbidden by the Turkish government to teach it to their schoolchildren. We came to deserted villages such as Kafro, whose inhabitants had been driven out by the attacks of Turkish Hezbollah, and which were now sealed off by the military. We visited the monastery of Tur Abdin, a major center of Eastern Christianity, now dwindling under suffocating government restrictions. We met the only two monks remaining in the monastery of the village of Sare.

In Nisibis (now Nusaybin in southeast Turkey ), where a famous Christian community dates back to the second century, and which nurtured Ephrem, the greatest of the Syrian theologians, there is a church dating from 439. It was locked and abandoned after World War I when the inhabitants, fleeing massacre, escaped into Syria . For 60 years there had been no Christians there, but now the diocese had sent a Christian family from a local village, who live in a small apartment in the church and try to keep it from falling apart.

We went into the crypt to see the tomb of Jacob of Nisibis, from whom the term "Jacobite" church is named, and while we studied his sarcophagus, our driver, unprompted, began to sing an ancient hymn. His strong voice filled the tomb. We asked him what the words meant, and he told us that the lyrics came from Ephrem himself:

Listen, my chicks have flown, left their nest, alarmed By the eagle. Look, where they hide in dread. Bring them back in peace.

How can this story be complete with the predictions of the Nostradamus of our time, General Chukwuemeka Odumegbu Ojukwu in ''Ahiara declaration''

ARAB-MUSLIM EXPANSIONISM

The Biafran struggle is, on another plane, a resistance to the Arab-Muslim expansionism which has menaced and ravaged the African continent for twelve centuries. As early as the first quarter of the seventh century, the Arabs, a people from the Near-East, evolved Islam not just as a religion but as a cover for their insatiable territorial ambitions. By the tenth century they had overrun and occupied, among other places, Egypt and North Africa. Had they stopped there, we would not today be faced with the wicked and unholy collusion we are fighting against. On the contrary, they cast their hungry and envious eyes across the Sahara on to the land of the Negroes.

Our Biafran ancestors remained immune from the Islamic contagion. From the middle years of the last century Christianity was established in our land. In this way we came to be a predominantly Christian people. We came to stand out as a non-Muslim island in a raging Islamic sea. Throughout the period of the ill-fated Nigerian experiment, the Muslims hoped to infiltrate Biafra by peaceful means and quiet propaganda, but failed. Then the late Ahmadu Bello, the Sarduana of Sokoto tried, by political and economic blackmail and terrorism, to convert Biafrans settled in Northern Nigeria to Islam. His hope was that these Biafrans on dispersion would then carry Islam to Biafra, and by so doing give the religion political control of the area. The crises which agitated the so-called independent Nigeria from 1962 gave these aggressive proselytisers the chance to try converting us by force.

It is now evident why the fanatic Arab-Muslim states like Algeria, Egypt and the Sudan have come out openly and massively to support and aid Nigeria in her present war of genocide against us. These states see militant Arabism as a powerful instrument for attaining power in the world.

Biafra is one of the few African states untainted by Islam. Therefore, to militant Arabism, Biafra is a stumbling block to their plan for controlling the whole continent. This control is fast becoming manifest in the Organisation of African Unity. On the question of the Middle East, the Sudanese crisis, in the war between Nigeria and Biafra, militant Arabism has succeeded in imposing its point of view through blackmail and bluster. It has threatened African leaders and governments with inciting their Muslim minorities to rebellion if the governments adopted an independent line on these questions. In this way an O.A.U that has not felt itself able to discuss the genocide in the Sudan and Biafra, an O.A.U. that has again and again advertised its ineptitude as a peace-maker, has rushed into open condemnation of Israel over the Middle East dispute. Indeed in recent times, by its performance, the O.A.U. might well be an Organisation of Arab Unity.

-M.M.Mbanaja